Preparation for parliamentary committees and hearings

About

Over the past three years, there has been a proliferation of commissions of inquiry and fact-finding missions in the National Assembly and the Senate. As key players in economic life, business leaders are increasingly called upon to explain themselves before these bodies.

Whether responding to industrial, economic or social crises, national representatives are increasingly using this tool to investigate, understand and sometimes challenge practices, decisions or actors. As major players in economic life, business leaders are increasingly called upon to explain themselves before these bodies.

However, unlike a hearing at a shareholders’ meeting or an exchange with journalists, speaking before a parliamentary committee is subject to strict and binding rules, both in terms of communication and the law.

A demanding legal context: the risk of perjury

Parliamentary committees of inquiry have extensive powers. When a director is heard under oath, particularly before a committee of inquiry, they are subject to the provisions of Article 6 of Order No. 58-1100 of 17 November 1958, as amended, relating to the functioning of parliamentary assemblies. Knowingly lying or concealing information constitutes perjury, punishable under Article 434-13 of the Criminal Code: ‘Making a false statement under oath before a parliamentary committee of inquiry is punishable by five years’ imprisonment and a fine of €75,000.’

This penalty is comparable to that applicable in criminal courts. It is therefore not simply a case of ‘bad timing’, but a legally binding act in an environment where every word can have political, media and legal implications.

Political speech must be handled strategically

Parliamentary hearings are not neutral exercises: questions are often leading, sometimes unsettling, and reflect the climate of public opinion, or even controversy. Leaders are judged as much on the substance of their answers as on their attitude, perceived transparency and ability to demonstrate civic-mindedness. Far from technical or financial rhetoric, this is an exercise in responsibility and legitimacy.

Our support: strategy, risk management and role-playing

That is why we offer specific coaching for executives and senior managers summoned to appear before investigative committees or fact-finding missions. Our support includes:

  • A strategic and political analysis of the context of the hearing (partisan issues, media climate, profile of committee members);
  • Clarification of the message and sensitive elements that need to be legally secured;
  • Drafting of a Q&A aimed at covering the various topics that may be discussed during the work of the inquiry committee or fact-finding mission;
  • Preparation for speaking under pressure, with simulations of hearings in real conditions.

Our objective is clear: to enable executives to respond accurately, confidently and seriously, while protecting their personal integrity, that of their company and its public reputation.